Supporting enhanced uplink transmission during soft handover

ABSTRACT

An enhanced uplink user equipment is in soft handover. A radio network controller selects a primary Node-B out of a plurality of Node-Bs supporting the soft handover. The radio network controller receiving successfully received enhanced uplink data packets from the plurality of Node-Bs. The radio network controller reordered the successfully received enhanced uplink data packets for in-sequence deliver. The primary Node-B sends specified scheduling information to the user equipment that the other Node-Bs does not transmit. At least the primary Node-B transmits acknowledgements and negative acknowledgements to the user equipment.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/699,418 filed on Sep. 8, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/869,313, filed on Sep. 29, 2015, now U.S. Pat.No. 9,763,156 issued on Sep. 12, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 13/908,242 filed on Jun. 3, 2013, now U.S.Pat. No. 9,215,636 issued on Dec. 15, 2015, which is a continuation ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/308,950 filed on Dec. 1, 2011, nowU.S. Pat. No. 8,457,072 issued on Jun. 4, 2013, which is a continuationof U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/434,330 filed on May 15, 2006,now U.S. Pat. No. 8,130,720 issued on Mar. 6, 2012, which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/962,720 filed Oct.12, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,046,648 issued on May 16, 2006, whichclaims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/578,674filed Jun. 10, 2004; 60/520,692 filed Nov. 17, 2003; 60/519,990 filedNov. 14, 2003; and 60/517,656 filed Nov. 5, 2003, all of which areincorporated by reference as if fully set forth.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention is related to a wireless communication system.More particularly, the present invention is related to a method andapparatus for coordinating Node-Bs and supporting enhanced uplink (EU)transmissions during handover.

BACKGROUND

Many schemes have been proposed to improve coverage, throughput, andtransmission latency for EU transmissions in third generationpartnership project (3GPP). One of the developments is to move thefunctions for scheduling and assigning uplink (UL) physical channelresources from a radio network controller (RNC) to a Node-B. A Node-Bcan make more efficient decisions and manage UL radio resources on ashort-term basis better than the RNC, even if the RNC retains overallcontrol over Node-Bs. A similar approach has already been adopted indownlink for high speed data packet access (HSDPA) in both universalmobile telecommunication system (UMTS) frequency division duplex (FDD)and time division duplex (TDD) modes.

It has also been recognized that performance is greatly enhanced withthe use of medium access control (MAC) level automatic repeat request(ARQ) and hybrid ARQ (H-ARQ). Application of these techniques duringsoft handover provides additional significant benefits.

FIG. 1 shows a conventional wireless multi-cell communication system 100including a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) 105, a Node-B 110, anRNC 115, and at least two cells 120A, 120B. Each of the cells 120A,120B, is served by the Node-B 110. Node-B 110 is controlled by the RNC115. When a change in the cell offering the best radio conditions isdetermined between cells 120A and 120B, a handover process is initiated.

An “intra-Node-B handover” occurs when a WTRU changes from one cell toanother cell controlled by the same Node-B, as shown in FIG. 1. An“inter-Node-B handover” occurs when a WTRU changes from one cell toanother cell controlled by a different Node-B. In the latter case, theNode-B that controls the cell before the handover is called a sourceNode-B, and the Node-B that controls the cell after the handover iscalled a target Node-B.

During soft handover, a WTRU establishes a plurality of connections witha plurality of Node-Bs in an active set. In this situation, a problemmay arise for scheduling and H-ARQ operation. A WTRU may receiveconflicting EU transmission scheduling from more than one Node-B. It isalso difficult for the WTRU to receive, decode and process H-ARQpositive and negative acknowledgements (ACKs/NACKs) generated by aplurality of Node-Bs. The soft buffer of an H-ARQ process in Node-Bs maybe corrupted during soft handover.

One method to support H-ARQ across multiple Node-Bs, when the WTRU is insoft handover, is to place the ACK/NACK generation function in the RNC,which derives a single ACK/NACK based on the results from the multipleNode-Bs. However, this approach presents a significant delay to theACK/NACK process, which is highly undesirable for performance reasons.

When a WTRU undergoes an inter-Node-B hard handover, there is apossibility that a source Node-B, which is a Node-B before hard handoveris completed, may not successfully receive EU transmissions for datapackets that have been NACKed prior to hard handover activation time.Other WTRUs competing for UL resources may not be provided with enoughphysical resources in the source cell. If data blocks that have beenNACKed prior to the handover are retransmitted to the source Node-Bbefore the handover activation timer expires, those data blocks can becombined with the previous data blocks for H-ARQ decoding. In this way,the decoding takes the advantage of previous, although failed,transmissions of those data blocks in the source cell. If data blocksthat have been NACKed prior to the handover are not retransmitted to thesource Node-B before the handover activation timer is expired, they haveto be transmitted again in the target cell as new data blocks. In thiscase, the previous transmissions of those data blocks in the source cellare not utilized.

SUMMARY

An enhanced uplink user equipment is in soft handover. A radio networkcontroller selects a primary Node-B out of a plurality of Node-Bssupporting the soft handover. The radio network controller receivingsuccessfully received enhanced uplink data packets from the plurality ofNode-Bs. The radio network controller reordered the successfullyreceived enhanced uplink data packets for in-sequence deliver. Theprimary Node-B sends specified scheduling information to the userequipment that the other Node-Bs does not transmit. At least the primaryNode-B transmits acknowledgements and negative acknowledgements to theuser equipment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more detailed understanding of the invention may be had from thefollowing description, given by way of example and to be understood inconjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 shows a conventional wireless communication system;

FIG. 2 shows a system which uses a UL scheduler located in a primaryNode-B during soft handover for EU in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 3 shows a system which uses an ACK/NACK generation function locatedin a primary Node-B during soft handover for EU in accordance with thepresent invention;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a process including method steps forcoordinating Node-Bs during soft handover in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a process including method steps forprioritizing the transmission of NACKed data in a source Node-B beforehard handover is completed in accordance with a separate embodiment ofthe present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention will be described with reference to the drawingfigures wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout.

Hereafter, the terminology “WTRU” includes but is not limited to a userequipment (UE), a mobile station, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, apager, or any other type of device capable of operating in a wirelessenvironment.

When referred to hereafter, the terminology “Node-B” includes but is notlimited to a base station, a site controller, an access point or anyother type of interfacing device in a wireless environment.

The present invention may be implemented in any type of wirelesscommunication systems, such as UMTS-FDD, TDD, time division synchronouscode division multiple access (TDSCDMA), code division multiple access2000 (CDMA2000) (EV-DO and EV-DV) or any other type of wirelesscommunication system.

The features of the present invention may be incorporated into an IC orbe configured in a circuit comprising a multitude of interconnectingcomponents.

FIG. 2 shows a wireless multi-cell communication system 200 which uses aUL scheduler located in a primary Node-B in accordance with the presentinvention. The wireless multi-cell communication system 200 includes aWTRU 205, a plurality of Node-Bs 210 (i.e., 210A, 210B), an RNC 215 anda plurality of cells 260 (i.e., 260A, 260B, 260C). Cells 260A and 260Care served by the Node-B 210A. Cells 260B are served by the Node-Bs210B. All of the Node-Bs 210 are controlled by the RNC 215.

During soft handover, the WTRU 205 establishes multiple connections withthe Node-Bs 210 included in an active set. Each transmission from theWTRU 205 is processed independently at each of the Node-Bs 210. One ofthe Node-Bs 210 in the active set is designated as a primary Node-B210A, and the other Node-Bs are designated as non-primary Node-Bs 210B.

As shown in FIG. 2, the primary Node-B 210A includes a MAC entity 250Aincluding a UL scheduler 255. Each of the non-primary Node-Bs 210B alsoincludes a MAC entity 250B. Each of the MAC entities 250A, 250B, handlesEU transmissions. The UL scheduler 255 in the MAC entity 250A isresponsible for scheduling the EU transmissions.

In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the ULscheduler 255 is implemented only at the primary Node-B 210A during softhandover. The WTRU 205 receives a UL transmission schedule only from theprimary Node-B 210A in a primary cell 260A. However, the primary Node-B210A cannot send the scheduling information to the non-primary Node-Bs210B in every transmission time interval (TTI). In order to allow theprimary Node-B 210A to allocate resources for the WTRU 205 to transmitin cells controlled by the non-primary Node-Bs 210B, those resourcesscheduled by the primary Node-B 250A in a plurality of cells 260Bcontrolled by the non-primary Node-Bs 210B cannot be assigned by thenon-primary Node-Bs 210B. Therefore, some physical resources common toall of the cells in the active EU subset should be assigned and reservedby a particular Node-B for the WTRU 205 during the soft handover, sothat those resources can be used only by the primary Node-B 210A.

The UL scheduler 255 located in the primary Node-B 210A considers theinterference level caused by the EU transmission at any cell 260A, 260B,260C, in the EU active subset to be below a predetermined maximumallowed interference level. Thus, the primary Node-B 250A limits thetransmit power level of the WTRU 205 such that the interference levelsare also within the maximum allowed interference levels at other cells260B, 260C. To achieve this, the RNC 215 needs to relay necessaryinformation, such as transmission power level and interference level, ofthe cells 260B controlled by the non-primary Node-Bs 210B to the primaryNode-B 210A, which then uses the information to schedule the ULtransmissions.

The EU scheduling information is transmitted to the WTRU 205 only by theprimary Node-B 210A through the primary cell 260A. During soft handover,the WTRU 205 receives EU scheduling information only in the primary cell260A, although the EU scheduling information is valid in all other cells260B, 260C.

In one embodiment, the primary Node-B 250A is selected by either the RNC215 or the WTRU 205. The RNC 215 may choose a Node-B that has thehighest percentage of correctly received data blocks during a predefinedtime window as a primary Node-B.

In another embodiment, the RNC 215 generates statistics for each Node-B,such as a bit error rate (BER) or a frame error rate (FER), or the like,over a predetermined time period. Then, the RNC 215 may select a Node-Bhaving the best performance to be the primary Node-B 210A. The RNC 215then notifies the WTRU 205 and all other Node-Bs about the primaryNode-B 210A via radio resource control (RRC) and Iub signaling,respectively.

In another embodiment, the WTRU 102 may choose a Node-B 210 that has thebest downlink pilot power, (i.e., best downlink path loss or highestcode power), as a primary Node-B 210A. The WTRU 205 measures the powerof pilot signals received from all Node-Bs 210 and selects the Node-B210 having the highest pilot power to be the primary Node-B 210A. TheWTRU 205 then notifies all other Node-Bs about the primary Node-B 210Avia fast physical layer signaling.

The WTRU 205 may report the downlink pilot power of all cells 260 to theRNC 215. The RNC 215 then chooses one Node-B 210 to be the primaryNode-B 210 a based on the combined uplink and downlink quality. Theuplink quality of a cell 260 based on the percentage of correctlyreceived data blocks, (or BER, FER, or the like), during a predefinedtime window, and the downlink quality of a cell 260 is based on the WTRUreceived downlink pilot power. Then, the RNC 215 notifies the WTRU 205and all of the Node-Bs 210 about the primary Node-B 210A via RRC and Iubsignaling, respectively.

The present invention is advantageous over prior art systems. Using thepresent invention, a WTRU does not receive conflicting scheduling of EUtransmissions from Node-Bs during soft handover. In addition, EUtransmission is scheduled in consideration of an interference level andradio resources in cells controlled by non-primary Node-Bs. Signalingdelay from the primary Node-B 210A to the WTRU 205 is much lower ascompared to signaling delay from the RNC 215 to the WTRU 205.

In a separate embodiment, FIG. 3 shows a wireless multi-cellcommunication system 300, similar to the system 200 shown in FIG. 2. Asshown in FIG. 3, the primary Node-B 210A includes a MAC entity 250Aincluding an ACK/NACK generator 305. Only the primary Node-B 210A hasthe ACK/NACK generator 305. The primary Node-B 210A may perform H-ARQwith incremental redundancy, or only ARQ without implementingincremental redundancy.

Still referring to FIG. 3, the primary Node-B 210A receives at least onedata packet from the WTRU 205 through the primary cell 260A and performsan error check on the data packet. Any error checking method, such as acyclic redundancy check (CRC), may be utilized. If the primary Node-B210A correctly decodes the data packet, such as passing the CRC, theprimary Node-B 210A transmits an ACK to the WTRU 205 and also transmitsthe correctly decoded data packet to the RNC 215. If the primary Node-B210A fails to correctly decode the data packet, the primary Node-B 210Atransmits a NACK to the WTRU 205.

The non-primary Node-Bs 210B also perform an error check on the datapacket. However, the non-primary Node-Bs 210B do not send ACKs or NACKsto the WTRU 205. Instead, the non-primary Node-Bs send successfullydecoded data packets to the RNC 215. During soft handover, only theprimary Node-B 210A generates H-ARQ (or ARQ), ACKs and NACKs, andcontrols retransmissions.

The MAC layer WTRU identities received by the non-primary Node-Bs 210Bmay be used for routing of successfully received transmissions in auniversal terrestrial radio access network (UTRAN). Since thenon-primary Node-Bs 210B are not aware of which WTRUs have beenscheduled for EU transmission by the primary Node-B 210A, thenon-primary Node-Bs 210B may rely on in-band MAC layer signaling of theWTRU ID to route correctly received transmissions to the correct RNCradio link. Even though the primary Node-B 210A may be aware of whichWTRU is scheduled, the same method may be implemented by the primaryNode-B 210A.

Preferably, the primary Node-B 210A may use soft combining to processtransmissions, while the non-primary Node-Bs 210B may process eachtransmission without soft combining. If the primary Node-B sends a NACKto the WTRU 205, the NACKed data packet is stored in a buffer of theprimary Node-B 210A, and the NACKed data packet is combined with aretransmitted data packet. In contrast, the non-primary Node-Bs 210B donot store the NACKed data packets. This eliminates the problem of softbuffer corruption between the Node-Bs 210, and the complexities ofmultiple independent ACKs and/or NACKs.

When an incremental combining process is implemented, measures should betaken to avoid soft buffer corruption. Sequence information or a newdata indicator is required to enable a Node-B 210 to detect that theWTRU 205 is no longer repeating data for a particular WTRU H-ARQprocess, but instead is sending new data. This is specifically requiredbecause the Node-B 210 has no other way to learn that a new transmissionhas started. Alternatively, the non-primary Node-Bs 210B may simplyperform an ARQ, without using an incremental combining process. Thiseliminates the soft buffer corruption problem.

In the case where non-primary Node-Bs 210B perform simple ARQ withoutincremental combining, the WTRU 205 must transmit self-decodable datapackets to ensure that all of the Node-Bs 210 may decode transmissions,regardless of the result of earlier transmissions. Preferably, the H-ARQfunctionality is terminated at the Node-Bs 210. Each of the Node-Bs 210sends to the RNC 215 successfully decoded data packets with explicitidentification of transmission, such as a transmission sequence number(TSN). The RNC 215 may optionally use data packets delivered from thenon-primary Node-Bs 210B. A MAC entity 310, located in the RNC 215, isused to implement an in-sequence delivery process for delivering data tohigher layers over all of the packets received from the Node-Bs 210.After the RNC MAC entity 310 has completed its re-ordering process, itsends the data to a radio link control (RLC) (not shown). Missed packetsare identified at the RNC 215 and the WTRU 205 is informed through RLCmessaging.

Alternatively, EU transmissions may identify WTRU ID, H-ARQ process,transmission sequence and/or new data indication (NDI) to allow for softcombining in the non-primary Node-B's 210B. If this method is used toallow soft combining in the non-primary Node-Bs 210B, the primary Node-B210A may not have to rely on scheduling and H-ARQ ACK/NACK decisions todetermine when combining should be performed.

There are two options for the transmission of ACK/NACK messages. Thefirst option is a synchronous transmission. The ACK/NACK messages aretransmitted after a unique time delay with respect to the correspondinguplink transmission or the EU channel allocation message. The secondoption is an asynchronous transmission. There is no unique delay betweenthe transmission of ACK/NACK messages and the corresponding uplinktransmission or the EU channel allocation message. Explicit informationin the ACK/NACK message identifies the corresponding uplink transmissionto enable the WTRU 205 to make the correct association between theACK/NACK message and the transmission. This association is made byeither identifying the H-ARQ process number and/or a unique sequencenumber, such as a TSN with each ACK/NACK feedback message to the WTRU205.

In a separate embodiment, preferably implemented for the asynchronousACK/NACK feedback case, the non-primary Node-Bs 210B may provide H-ARQACK/NACK results to the primary Node-B 210A in order to avoidunnecessary retransmissions for transmissions that are not correctlyreceived by the primary Node-B 210A, but are correctly received by thenon-primary Node-Bs 210B. A non-primary Node-B 210B does not directlysend an ACK or NACK message to the WTRU 205. The non-primary Node-Bs210B sends ACK/NACK or CRC results to the RNC 215. Then, the RNC 215sends ACK or CRC results to the primary Node-B 210A.

In order to speed up H-ARQ processing, the first ACK message from anynon-primary Node-B 210B received by the RNC is preferably immediatelyforwarded to the primary Node-B 210A. The primary Node-B 210A alsoimmediately generates an ACK message if the transmission is receivedcorrectly in the primary Node-B 210A without waiting for feedback fromthe non-primary Node-Bs 210B. The primary Node-B 210A also generates anACK message immediately upon reception of a forwarded ACK message fromthe RNC, even if other ACK messages may be forwarded. Since an ACK isgenerated if any of the paths are successful, an ACK can be generated assoon as the first successful transmission is found.

Alternatively, in order to simplify the design of the ACK/NACK generator205, only a subset of the generating nodes may be used. For example,ACKs may be generated only at the RNC, or at the RNC and the primaryNode-B 210A.

When the WTRU 205 sends an uplink transmission, for each H-ARQ processthe WTRU 205 waits at least the time required for the primary Node-B210A to send ACK/NACK feedback. For each H-ARQ process, if an ACK isreceived by the WTRU 205, the WTRU 205 may send new data in the nextavailable or assigned opportunity.

A NACK message can only originate in the RNC 215 since it is the onlynode that has all of the information necessary in the soft handover todetermine that there have been no successful receptions at any Node-B210. The RNC 215 generates a NACK command if the RNC 215 receives no ACKfrom the Node-Bs 210 within a predetermined time interval. The RNC 215forwards the NACK message to the WTRU 205 via the primary Node-B 210A.

It is also possible that this procedure can be implemented without anexplicit NACK command. In this case, the lack of ACK reception within aparticular period of time is considered the same as an explicit NACKcommand at either the primary Node-B 210A and/or the WTRU 205.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a process 400 including method steps forcoordinating Node-Bs during soft handover in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention. In step 405, the RNC 215 makes adecision to initiate an inter-Node-B soft handover. In step 410, theWTRU 205 establishes connections with at least two Node-Bs 210 in anactive set. In step 415, one of the Node-Bs 210 in the active set isdesignated as a primary Node-B 210A and the one or more Node-B(s) 210remaining in the active set are designated as a non-primary Node-Bs210B. In step 420, the primary Node-B 210A controls UL transmissionsduring soft handover by performing EU scheduling and H-ARQ operations.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a process 500 including method steps forprioritizing the transmission of NACKed data in a source Node-B beforehard handover is completed in accordance with a separate embodiment ofthe present invention. In step 505, the RNC 215 makes a decision toinitiate a hard handover for a WTRU 205 connected to a source Node-B210. In step 510, the RNC 215 informs the source Node-B 210 when theWTRU 205 will stop transmission and reception in the source cell 260. Instep 515, the RNC 215 sends an activation timer to the source Node-B 210to set the time for handover.

Still referring to FIG. 5, if the source Node-B 210 determines thatthere are data packets that were previously NACKed, as many previouslyNACKed data packets as possible should be retransmitted before thehandover activation timer expires. Otherwise, the system may lose thebenefit of incrementally combining the previous transmission with theretransmission. Therefore, the source Node-B scheduler 255 takes thehandover activation time into account when it schedules the data packetsthat have been NACKed. If there is not enough radio resource for thesource Node-B 210 to schedule transmission of all the NACKed datapackets in time, the source Node-B 210 should manage to scheduletransmission of as many NACKed data packets as possible.

Still referring to FIG. 5, in order to transmit as many NACKed datapackets as possible before the activation timer expires, the sourceNode-B 210 adjusts the priority of transmissions (step 525) and, in step530, the source node-B 210 adjusts the MCS of the transmissions (step530). Higher priority of scheduling is given to the data packets thathave been NACKed. If the radio resources are sufficient, a more robustMCS may be used to increase the probability of successful transmissionsfrom the WTRU 205 to the source Node-B 210. In step 535, the handover iscompleted at the expiration of the activation timer.

In order for the WTRU 205 to understand that the scheduled uplinktransmission is intended for data blocks with previous transmissionfailures, the source Node-B 210 uplink scheduler 255 may specify thatthe scheduled UL transmission is intended for the data blocks that werepreviously NACKed. This may be implemented by including H-ARQ processidentification in the UL scheduling information that is sent from thesource Node-B 210 to the WTRU 205. By receiving the schedulinginformation from the source Node-B 210, the WTRU 205 knows that thescheduled transmission is for specific data associated with HARQ processidentification sent together with the scheduling information.

While this invention has been particularly shown and described withreference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by thoseskilled in the art that various changes in forms and details may be madetherein without departing from the scope of the invention as describedabove.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for communicating by a wirelesstransmit/receive unit (WTRU) during a handover process between a primarycell and a non-primary cell, the method comprising: receiving schedulinginformation from the primary cell; transmitting, via the primary celland the non-primary cell, enhanced uplink (EU) data according to thescheduling information, wherein the WTRU transmits the EU data usinguplink resources specified for the WTRU in the scheduling informationand such that a level of interference at the primary cell and a level ofinterference at the non-primary cell are controlled; processing hybridautomatic repeat request (HARQ) acknowledgements (ACKs) from the primarycell; and processing negative acknowledgements (NACKs) from the primarycell and not from the non-primary cell.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising: receiving an identifier indicating the primary celland the non-primary cell.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:transmitting downlink power measurements of transmissions received bythe WTRU.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the EU data includesidentification information of the WTRU.
 5. The method of claim 1,wherein the scheduling information includes any one or a combination ofa HARQ process identification and a transmit power level of the WTRU. 6.The method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting the EU datausing synchronous HARQ.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the EU data istransmitted in accordance with the received scheduling information. 8.The method of claim 1, further comprising: retransmitting the EU datafrom the WTRU via the primary cell and the non-primary cell upon receiptof a NACK.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the handover process is asoft handover.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the interference levelat the primary cell and the interference level at the non-primary cellare controlled such that the interference level at the primary cell isbelow a predetermined interference level for the primary cell and theinterference level at the non-primary cell is below a predeterminedinterference level for the non-primary cell.
 11. A wireless networkcomprising a plurality of Node-Bs configured to communicate with awireless transmit/receiver unit (WTRU) during a handover process betweena first Node-B of the plurality of Node-Bs and a second Node-B of theplurality of Node-Bs by: transmitting scheduling information to the WTRUvia the first Node-B; receiving enhanced uplink (EU) data from the WTRUat the first Node-B and the second Node-B according to the schedulinginformation, wherein the EU data is received using uplink resourcesspecified for the WTRU in the scheduling information and such that alevel of interference at the first Node-B and a level of interference atthe second Node-B are controlled; transmitting hybrid automatic repeatrequest (HARQ) acknowledgements (ACKs) to the WTRU via the first Node-B;and transmitting negative acknowledgements (NACKs) to the WTRU via thefirst Node-B and not via the second Node-B.
 12. The wireless network ofclaim 11, wherein the first Node-B controls a primary cell and thesecond Node-B controls a non-primary cell.
 13. The wireless network ofclaim 11, further comprising: a radio network controller (RNC) totransmit to the plurality of Node-Bs an identifier indicating the firstNode-B and the second Node-B.
 14. The wireless network of claim 11,wherein the plurality of Node-Bs is further configured to receive, fromthe WTRU, downlink power measurements of transmissions received by theWTRU.
 15. The wireless network of claim 11, wherein the EU data includesidentification information of the WTRU.
 16. The wireless network ofclaim 11, wherein the scheduling information includes any one or acombination of a HARQ process identification and a transmit power levelof the WTRU.
 17. The wireless network of claim 11, wherein the first andsecond Node-Bs are further configured to receive the EU data usingsynchronous HARQ.
 18. The wireless network of claim 11, wherein thehandover process is a soft handover.
 19. The wireless network of claim11, wherein the interference level at the primary cell and theinterference level at the non-primary cell are controlled such that theinterference level at the primary cell is below a predeterminedinterference level for the primary cell and the interference level atthe non-primary cell is below a predetermined interference level for thenon-primary cell.
 20. A Node B comprising: at least one transceiver; anda processor; wherein, when the Node B is performing an intra-Node Bhandover process for a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) between aprimary cell and a non-primary cell, the processor causes the at leastone transceiver to: transmit, via the primary cell, schedulinginformation to the WTRU to schedule enhanced uplink (EU) datatransmissions from the WTRU, receive, at the primary cell and thenon-primary cell, EU data transmissions from the WTRU, wherein the EUdata transmissions from the WTRU are received using uplink resourcesspecified for the WTRU in the scheduling information and such that alevel of interference at the primary cell and a level of interference atthe non-primary cell are controlled, transmit, via the primary cell,hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) acknowledgements (ACKs) to theWTRU, and transmit, via the primary cell but not via the non-primarycell, negative acknowledgements (NACKs) to the WTRU.
 21. The Node B ofclaim 20, wherein the transceiver is configured to process an identifierindicating the primary cell and the non-primary cell.
 22. The Node B ofclaim 20, wherein the transceiver is configured to receive downlinkpower measurements of transmissions transmitted by the transceiver. 23.The Node B of claim 20, wherein the EU data includes identificationinformation of the WTRU.
 24. The Node B of claim 20, wherein thescheduling information includes any one or a combination of a HARQprocess identification and a transmit power level.
 25. The Node B ofclaim 20, wherein the transceiver receives the EU data using synchronousHARQ.
 26. The Node B of claim 20, wherein the transceiver receives theEU data in accordance with the transmitted scheduling information. 27.The Node B of claim 20, wherein the EU data transmissions are scheduledto control interference at the primary cell and at the non-primary cell.28. The Node-B of claim 20, wherein the interference level at theprimary cell and the interference level at the non-primary cell arecontrolled such that the interference level at the primary cell is belowa predetermined interference level for the primary cell and theinterference level at the non-primary cell is below a predeterminedinterference level for the non-primary cell.
 29. A wirelesscommunication system comprising: a wireless transmit/receiver unit(WTRU); and a wireless network including a primary cell and anon-primary cell, the primary cell and the non-primary cell beingassociated with a Node-B, wherein, during a handover process between theprimary cell and the non-primary cell, the Node-B is configured totransmit scheduling information to the WTRU via the primary cell toschedule enhanced uplink (EU) data transmissions from the WTRU, the WTRUis configured to transmit EU data to the Node-B via the primary cell andthe non-primary cell, wherein the WTRU transmits the EU data usinguplink resources specified for the WTRU in the scheduling informationand such that a level of interference at the primary cell and a level ofinterference at the non-primary cell are controlled, the Node-B isconfigured to receive, via the primary cell and the non-primary cell, EUdata transmissions from the WTRU according to the schedulinginformation, the Node-B is configured to transmit hybrid automaticrepeat request (HARQ) acknowledgements (ACKs) via the primary cell, andthe Node-B is configured to transmit negative acknowledgements (NACKs)via the primary cell and to not transmit the NACKs via the non-primarycell.
 30. The wireless communication system of claim 29, wherein theNode-B is further configured to receive, from the WTRU, downlink powermeasurements of transmissions received by the WTRU.
 31. The wirelesscommunication system of claim 29, wherein the EU data includesidentification information of the WTRU.
 32. The wireless communicationsystem of claim 29, wherein the scheduling information includes any oneor a combination of a HARQ process identification and a transmit powerlevel of the WTRU.
 33. The wireless communication system of claim 29,wherein the interference level at the primary cell and the interferencelevel at the non-primary cell are controlled such that the interferencelevel at the primary cell is below a predetermined interference levelfor the primary cell and the interference level at the non-primary cellis below a predetermined interference level for the non-primary cell.34. A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprising: at least onetransceiver; and a processor, wherein, during a handover process betweena primary cell and a non-primary cell, the processor is configured tocause the at least one transceiver to: receive scheduling informationfrom the primary cell; transmit, via the primary cell and thenon-primary cell, enhanced uplink (EU) data according to the schedulinginformation, wherein the EU data is transmitted using uplink resourcesspecified for the WTRU in the scheduling information and such that alevel of interference at the primary cell and a level of interference atthe non-primary cell are controlled; process hybrid automatic repeatrequest (HARQ) acknowledgements (ACKs) from the primary cell; andprocess negative acknowledgements (NACKs) from the primary cell and notfrom the non-primary cell.
 35. The WTRU of claim 34, wherein theprocessor is further configured to cause the at least one transceiver toreceive an identifier indicating the primary cell and the non-primarycell.
 36. The WTRU of claim 34, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to cause the at least one transceiver to transmit downlinkpower measurements of transmissions received by the WTRU.
 37. The WTRUof claim 34, wherein the EU data includes identification information ofthe WTRU.
 38. The WTRU of claim 34, wherein the scheduling informationincludes any one or a combination of a HARQ process identification and atransmit power level of the WTRU.
 39. The WTRU of claim 34, wherein theprocessor is further configured to cause the at least one transceiver totransmit the EU data using synchronous HARQ.
 40. The WTRU of claim 34,wherein the processor is further configured to cause the at least onetransceiver to transmit the EU data in accordance with the receivedscheduling information.
 41. The WTRU of claim 34, wherein the processoris further configured to cause the at least one transceiver toretransmit the EU data from the WTRU via the primary cell and thenon-primary cell upon receipt of a NACK.
 42. The WTRU of claim 34,wherein the handover process is a soft handover.
 43. The WTRU of claim34, wherein the interference level at the primary cell and theinterference level at the non-primary cell are controlled such that theinterference level at the primary cell is below a predeterminedinterference level for the primary cell and the interference level atthe non-primary cell is below a predetermined interference level for thenon-primary cell.